[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 14:37:56 +0100 (CET)
From: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
To: Guo Chao <yan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: tytso@....edu, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ext4: remove redundant initialization in
ext4_fill_super()
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012, Guo Chao wrote:
> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 14:41:46 +0800
> From: Guo Chao <yan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> To: tytso@....edu
> Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH 4/4] ext4: remove redundant initialization in
> ext4_fill_super()
>
> We use kzalloc() to allocate sbi, no need to zero its field.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Chao <yan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/super.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 15d28e3..a99f6c7 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -3799,7 +3799,6 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sbi->s_orphan); /* unlinked but open files */
> mutex_init(&sbi->s_orphan_lock);
> - sbi->s_resize_flags = 0;
>
> sb->s_root = NULL;
>
>
There are other members of sbi which we initialize to zero even
though we use kzalloc.
Thanks!
-Lukas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists