[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50BC374C.7050705@tao.ma>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 13:23:24 +0800
From: Tao Ma <tm@....ma>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
CC: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 03/23] ext4: Add the basic function for inline data
support.
On 12/03/2012 09:48 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:55:18AM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:
>> + EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA, /* may have in-inode data */
>
> Can you write a paragraph or two about exactly what the semantics are
> of this state flag --- what it means, when it should be set, and when
> it should be cleared, etc.?
>
> I'm not entirely sure I understand why you test
> EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA versus simply calling
> ext4_has_inline_data() in various places.
OK, so in general, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA is a flag that show that
the file has a potential to be inlined, but there is no guarantee it is
inlined.
So when the inode is created and the volume has inline-data support,
this flag is set. And when the write_begin comes, we have no idea
whether it is OK or not to create an inline file, so if this flag is
set, we just try to call the inline-data stuff to see whether it works.
If it succeeds, that is cool. But if not, this flag is cleared and we
will not trap to inline-data stuff for the future write_begin. The
reason why ext4_has_inline_data() doesn't work here is that a new file
has no inline data but has the potential to be inlined.
Thanks
Tao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists