[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50D12DAA.9050700@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:59:54 -0600
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
CC: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
Don't send an extra wakeup to kjournald in the case where we
already have the proper target in j_commit_request, i.e. that
transaction has already been requested for commit.
commit deeeaf13 "jbd2: fix fsync() tid wraparound bug" changed
the logic leading to a wakeup, but it caused some extra wakeups
which were found to lead to a measurable performance regression.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
---
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
index dbf41f9..89970d5 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
@@ -518,7 +518,8 @@ int __jbd2_log_start_commit(journal_t *journal, tid_t target)
* currently running transaction (if it exists). Otherwise,
* the target tid must be an old one.
*/
- if (journal->j_running_transaction &&
+ if (journal->j_commit_request != target &&
+ journal->j_running_transaction &&
journal->j_running_transaction->t_tid == target) {
/*
* We want a new commit: OK, mark the request and wakeup the
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists