[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50DA61E8.5090009@asianux.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 10:33:12 +0800
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
CC: jack@...e.cz, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/ext3: set pointer = NULL, after kfree it
于 2012年12月26日 02:51, Theodore Ts'o 写道:
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 01:58:14PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>
>> set s->base = NULL, after kfree it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
>
> Was this to fix something flagged by some static code checker? The
> only caller of ext3_xattr_block_set() is ext3_xattr_set_handle(), and
> s->base is stored on the stack, and as soon as ext3_xattr_block_set()
> returns, the object will disappear. So it seems pretty hard to see
> how this could lead to a use-after-free bug.
>
> - Ted
>
>
this patch is not for a bug
it is only for coding habit:
it is better to set is to NULL, after kfree it.
in the future, if another functions need call ext3_xattr_block_set, too.
it will avoid another members to make mistake.
since it is not for fixing bug, it is really a minor patch.
I can understand if you do not apply it.
--
Chen Gang
Asianux Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists