[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50DA8C5C.9040200@asianux.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:34:20 +0800
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
CC: jack@...e.cz, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/ext3: use kzalloc instead of kmalloc
I prefer:
define a macro in .h file and give comments with relative information.
for function ext3_acl_size, use the macro instead of hard code number "4"
(then not need to comment for the function ext3_acl_size)
gchen.
于 2012年12月26日 13:08, Chen Gang 写道:
>> Ah, I see. What's there is OK, but it's not at all obvious that it's
>> > OK. A valid acl must have a very specific order of tags, as enforced
>> > by posix_acl_valid() in fs/posix_acl.c:
>> >
>> > ACL_USER_OBJ ACL_USER*[1] ACL_GROUP_OBJ ACL_GROUP*[1] ACL_MASK[2] ACL_OTHER
>> >
>> > [1] Where * is the regexp sense of "0 or more times"
>> > [2] Only if there is at least one ACL_USER or ACL_GROUP tag; otherwise
>> > skip ACL_MASK.
>> >
>> > Hence, a valid acl can have at most 4 short acl entry types
>> > (ACL_USER_OBJ, ACL_GROUP, ACL_MASK, and ACL_OTHER), and if there is
>> > less than 4 acl entries, they must all be short acl types.
>> >
>> > All I can say is, this is a horrible way of coding things, and I wish
>> > this was documented explicitly somewhere either in fs/posix_acl.c or
>> > in include/linux/posix_acl.h. Yuck, yuck, yuck....
>> >
>> > - Ted
> learned.
>
> :-)
>
> also better to give a comment above the function ext3_acl_size.
>
> thanks.
--
Chen Gang
Asianux Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists