lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130107042451.GB4956@thunk.org> Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 23:24:52 -0500 From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com> Cc: Guo Chao <yan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ext4: release buffer in failed path in dx_probe() On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 11:41:35AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 03:43:00PM +0800, Guo Chao wrote: > > If checksum fails, we should also release the buffer > > read from previous iteration. > > > > Cc: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com> > > Signed-off-by: Guo Chao <yan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Thanks, applied. > Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com> BTW, technically speaking it should be "Reviewed-by"; that's what I've used in the commit. "Acked-by:" gets used when a commit touches multiple subsystem trees. For example, suppose someone changes a function in fs/direct-io.c, which also required changes in btrfs, xfs, and ext4. This commit might go through Al Viro's vfs tree, and might have an Acked-by from Chris Mason, Dave Chinner, and me, indicating that developers who are well versed in those trees have agreed that the patches which touched those other subsystems looked sane. Since in this case the commit only touches ext4 code, and is going through the ext4 tree, "Reviewed-by" is what normally gets used. Cheers, - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists