[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50F4ABC6.6080001@opensuse.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:07:18 -0300
From: Cristian Rodríguez <crrodriguez@...nsuse.org>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
CC: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/ext2fs/bitops.h: Use the optmized/documented byteswapping
routines
On 01/14/2013 11:13 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 04:32:25PM -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
>> In x86, it will not make much difference but other targets that
>> are not covered by the old code will be able to generate better code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cristian Rodríguez <crrodriguez@...nsuse.org>
>
> The problem is that bswap_{16,32,64}() and the existence of
> <byteswap.h> is not guaranted by any standard that I'm not aware of.
> A quick Google search indicates that it's not available for the
> following platforms:
>
> * Mac OS X 10.5
> * FreeBSD 6.0
> * NetBSD 5.0
> * OpenBSD 3.8
> * Minix 3.1.8
> * AIX 5.1
> * HP-UX 11
> * IRIX 6.5
> * OSF/1 5.1
> * Solaris 11 2011-11
> * Cygwin
> * mingw
> * MSVC 9
> * Interix 3.5
> * BeOS
>
> So the only way we could use bswap_{16,32,64} if there is a proper
> configure.in test for them.
The code does not compile anyway at least in mingw (I just tried) and
probably in several other targets anyway.. with or without my patch :-)
I wonder *where* the developers of this other systems are and if they
are willing to submit any improvement or fixes for the software.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists