[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130117212415.GD23984@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 22:24:15 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ext4: Use redirty_page_for_writepage() in
ext4_bio_write_page()
On Thu 17-01-13 13:35:01, Ted Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 06:45:41PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > When we cannot write a page we should use redirty_page_for_writepage()
> > instead of plain set_page_dirty(). That tells writeback code we have
> > problems, redirties only the page (redirtying buffers is not needed),
> > and updates mm accounting of failed page writes.
> >
> > Also move clearing of buffer dirty flag after io_submit_add_bh(). At that
> > moment we are sure buffer will be going to disk.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
>
> This sounds like a bug fix, not just a clean up. Do you think the
Yes, it's a bug fix.
> impact of not using redirty_page_for_writeback() is bad enough that we
> should add a cc: stable@...r.kernel.org tag? As I recall, not doing
> this would end up leaving the page flags and radix tree to be
> inconsistent, right?
No, it shouldn't cause any such serious harm. Just writeback may retry
writing the inode immediately (it backs off if it sees skipped pages) which
could result in needless spinning. Also some mm/bdi statistics will get
slightly off. But all in all I don't think it's a stable material.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists