linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 3/5] ext4: Remove bogus wait for unwritten extents in ext4_ind_direct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130117215814.GA7356@thunk.org>
Date:	Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:58:14 -0500
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] ext4: Remove bogus wait for unwritten extents in
 ext4_ind_direct_IO

On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 03:24:37PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 06:45:42PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > When using indirect blocks there is no possibility to have any unwritten
> > extents. So wait for them in ext4_ind_direct_IO() is just bogus.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> 
> Hi Jan,
> 
> Just for the note, this patch conflicts with my patch set of extent
> status tree.  I guess your patch series will be applied before my patch
> set.  So I will rebase my patch set against the latest kernel. :-)

Actually, the extent status tree patches are already in my tree,
although I'm still testing and reviewing them. so they haven't been
finalized yet (which is why I haven't sent an e-mail ack).  If the
conflict is minor, I'll take care of it.  If it's non-trivial, I'll
yell for help.  :-)

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html