linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 2/2] quota: autoload the quota_v2 module for QFMT_VFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130121151008.GM5588@quack.suse.cz>
Date:	Mon, 21 Jan 2013 16:10:08 +0100
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] quota: autoload the quota_v2 module for
 QFMT_VFS_V1 quota format

On Mon 21-01-13 10:01:34, Ted Tso wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:40:17AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Mon 21-01-13 01:46:21, Ted Tso wrote:
> > > Otherwise, ext4 file systems with the quota feature enable will get a
> > > very confusing "No such process" error message if the quota code is
> > > built as a mdoule and the quota_v2 module has not been loaded.
> >   Thanks for the fix. Should I merge it via my tree or do you plan to do it
> > via your tree?
> 
> I'm happy to keep the patch in my tree (since I need it for my ext4
> quota testing), unless you'd like to take it.  It seems unlikely to
> cause any conflicts with any changes you might have in your quota
> tree, yes?
  Exactly. There shouldn't be any conflicts so just keep it in your tree.
You can add to the patch:
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html