[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130125150948.GK28908@thunk.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:09:48 -0500
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: call WARN_ON after the debug message
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:22:44AM +0100, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
>
> we can get the EIO error from ext4_map_blocks not only in the case
> of hardware error. The extent tree might not be in consistent state,
> or we could even ask for blocks outside the file system itself (I
> believe I've seen this before) and I think that in those cases it
> might be worth to all WARN_ON.
Sure, but in those cases, the file system is corrupt, and we should
have thrown an ext4_error() in ext4_map_blocks(). The point is that a
WARN_ON is only useful if there is a potential programming bug. If we
know for sure that it's caused by a file system corruption, then we
don't want to throw a WARN_ON.
Even if there is a kerneloops.org replacement --- in fact, especially
if there is kerneloops.org replacement --- we only want to throw
WARN_ON's in cases where it's just a pedestrian file system
corruption. Otherwise we'll end up wasting a lot of time chasing down
something which was caused by a hardware error, and needing to calm
down users (and breathless, spectacularizing, irresponsible journalism
from web sites such as Phoronix).
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists