lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130125150948.GK28908@thunk.org> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:09:48 -0500 From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> To: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com> Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: call WARN_ON after the debug message On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:22:44AM +0100, Lukáš Czerner wrote: > > we can get the EIO error from ext4_map_blocks not only in the case > of hardware error. The extent tree might not be in consistent state, > or we could even ask for blocks outside the file system itself (I > believe I've seen this before) and I think that in those cases it > might be worth to all WARN_ON. Sure, but in those cases, the file system is corrupt, and we should have thrown an ext4_error() in ext4_map_blocks(). The point is that a WARN_ON is only useful if there is a potential programming bug. If we know for sure that it's caused by a file system corruption, then we don't want to throw a WARN_ON. Even if there is a kerneloops.org replacement --- in fact, especially if there is kerneloops.org replacement --- we only want to throw WARN_ON's in cases where it's just a pedestrian file system corruption. Otherwise we'll end up wasting a lot of time chasing down something which was caused by a hardware error, and needing to calm down users (and breathless, spectacularizing, irresponsible journalism from web sites such as Phoronix). - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists