[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130128144528.GF22711@thunk.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 09:45:28 -0500
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] ext4: Move work from io_end to inode
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 01:00:40PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> It does not make much sense to have struct work in ext4_io_end_t because we
> always use it for only one ext4_io_end_t per inode (the first one in the
> i_completed_io list). So just move the structure to inode itself. This also
> allows for a small simplification in processing io_end structures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Thanks, applied.
(Note, I haven't applied patch 5 yet because it has a dependency on
patch #4, and I'm waiting to hear whether we should apply this given
the race condition which Dmitry has found. It sounds like it's a
pre-existing condition, and not a regression, but I want get a
confirmation that applying patches 5 and 6 won't make things worse...)
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists