[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130128045713.GA13680@thunk.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 23:57:13 -0500
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 2/2 v2] ext4: let us fully support punching hole
feature in fallocate
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 01:04:42PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
>
> Sorry, my apology. I found a bug in indirect-based hole punching patch
> when I tried to create a new test case in xfstest. A patch has been
> sent out. Please look at it.
Ah yes, this must be the patch found at:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/216105/
It would it make sense for me to fold this into the punch hole patch,
yes? (Since I haven't pushed out the patch yet, I might as well just
fold in the bugfix into the feature patch.)
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists