linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 4/4] ext4: remove unnecessary NULL pointer check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130129024001.GA10442@yanx>
Date:	Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:40:01 +0800
From:	Guo Chao <yan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc:	tytso@....edu, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ext4: remove unnecessary NULL pointer check

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 05:24:13PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 04:01:14PM +0800, Guo Chao wrote:
> > brelse() and ext4_journal_force_commit() are both inlined and able
> > to handle NULL.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Guo Chao <yan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> This one looks ok too, so:
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
> 
> PS: Does the order of the patches matter?  Or are these just four patches that
> are mostly independent of each other?
> 
> --D

They are random independent fixes.

Thanks

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html