[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130129012150.GB4754@blackbox.djwong.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:21:50 -0800
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To: Guo Chao <yan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: tytso@....edu, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ext4: remove useless assignment in dx_probe()
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 04:01:13PM +0800, Guo Chao wrote:
> No body care about the effect of this assignment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Chao <yan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/namei.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c
> index b3717a3..e35ea3d 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
> @@ -714,7 +714,7 @@ dx_probe(const struct qstr *d_name, struct inode *dir,
> *err = ERR_BAD_DX_DIR;
> goto fail2;
> }
> - at = entries = ((struct dx_node *) bh->b_data)->entries;
> + entries = ((struct dx_node *) bh->b_data)->entries;
The 'at' variable seems to be used (in a if(0)'d code block) to check the
results of the binary search against a slow linear search. Perhaps we should
get rid of the if(0) hunk about 30 lines up? The 'at' variable itself could go
too, since it seems to be an alias of "p - 1" and frame->at.
--D
>
> if (!buffer_verified(bh) &&
> !ext4_dx_csum_verify(dir,
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists