lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130131165055.GF4612@quack.suse.cz> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:50:55 +0100 From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> To: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com> Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9 v4] ext4: track all extent status in extent status tree On Thu 31-01-13 13:17:53, Zheng Liu wrote: > From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com> > > By recording the phycisal block and status, extent status tree is able > to track the status of every extents. When we call _map_blocks > functions to lookup an extent or create a new written/unwritten/delayed > extent, this extent will be inserted into extent status tree. > > We don't load all extents from disk in alloc_inode() because it costs > too much memory, and if a file is opened and closed frequently it will > takes too much time to load all extent information. So currently when > we create/lookup an extent, this extent will be inserted into extent > status tree. Hence, the extent status tree may not comprehensively > contain all of the extents found in the file. > > Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com> > Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> > --- > fs/ext4/extents.c | 5 +++- > fs/ext4/file.c | 6 +++-- > fs/ext4/inode.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- > 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c > index aa9a6d2..d23a654 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c > @@ -2074,7 +2074,7 @@ static int ext4_fill_fiemap_extents(struct inode *inode, > } > > /* This is possible iff next == next_del == EXT_MAX_BLOCKS */ > - if (next == next_del) { > + if (next == next_del && next_del == EXT_MAX_BLOCKS) { This doesn't seem to be related, does it? > diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c > index e09c7cf..f0dda2a 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c > @@ -615,18 +615,27 @@ int ext4_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, > (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE)) > ext4_da_update_reserve_space(inode, retval, 1); > } > - if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE) { > + if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE) > ext4_clear_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_DELALLOC_RESERVED); > > - if (retval > 0 && map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_MAPPED) { > - int ret; > -delayed_mapped: > - /* delayed allocation blocks has been allocated */ > - ret = ext4_es_remove_extent(inode, map->m_lblk, > - map->m_len); > - if (ret < 0) > - retval = ret; > - } > + if (retval > 0) { > + int ret, status; > + > + if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO) > + status = EXTENT_STATUS_UNWRITTEN; > + else if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT) > + status = EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN; > + else if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_UNINIT_EXT) > + status = EXTENT_STATUS_UNWRITTEN; > + else if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE) > + status = EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN; > + else > + BUG_ON(1); > + > + ret = ext4_es_insert_extent(inode, map->m_lblk, map->m_len, > + map->m_pblk, status); > + if (ret < 0) > + retval = ret; Hum, are you sure the extent status will be correct? Won't it be safer to just use whatever we have in 'map'? Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists