linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 1/3] Ext2: remove the overhead check about sb in the function ext2_new

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130206065645.GA32665@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:56:46 +0800
From:	Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>
To:	Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@...il.com>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Ext2: remove the overhead check about sb in the
 function ext2_new_blocks

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 12:22:47PM -0800, Wang Shilong wrote:
> From: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> 
> It can be guranteed that inode->i_sb should not be null in vfs.
> So here the check about it is overhead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> 
> sorry about wrong format patch， i will resend it later.

Hi Shilong,

If you want to re-send a patch series, add [RESEND] in subject, please.
Because it could make us know which is the latest one. :-)

Regards,
                                                - Zheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html