[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130206124612.GC6330@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 13:46:12 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Wang shilong <wangshilong1991@...il.com>
Cc: jack@...e.cz, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Ext2: remove the overhead check about sb in the
function ext2_new_blocks
On Wed 06-02-13 14:14:26, Wang shilong wrote:
> From: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@...fujitsu.com>
>
> It can be guranteed that inode->i_sb should not be null in vfs.
> So here the check about it is overhead.
This patch looks good. I've added it to my tree.
Honza
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> fs/ext2/balloc.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext2/balloc.c b/fs/ext2/balloc.c
> index 1c36139..22993a0 100644
> --- a/fs/ext2/balloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext2/balloc.c
> @@ -1239,10 +1239,6 @@ ext2_fsblk_t ext2_new_blocks(struct inode *inode, ext2_fsblk_t goal,
>
> *errp = -ENOSPC;
> sb = inode->i_sb;
> - if (!sb) {
> - printk("ext2_new_blocks: nonexistent device");
> - return 0;
> - }
>
> /*
> * Check quota for allocation of this block.
> --
> 1.7.11.7
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists