linux-ext4 - Re: ext4 xfstests-bld results for 3.8-rc6 on Pandaboard ES

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <4D4DE7C7-35AE-4D26-9283-DA489CC449A4@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:36:17 +0800
From:	"gnehzuil.liu" <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>
To:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Eric Whitney <enwlinux@...il.com>,
	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ext4 xfstests-bld results for 3.8-rc6 on Pandaboard ES



发自我的 iPad

在 2013-2-11，上午11:24，Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> 写道：

> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 09:08:36PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> BEGIN TEST: Ext4 4k block w/nodelalloc, no flex_bg, and no extents Sun Feb 10 16:29:53 EST 2013
>> Failures: 255
> 
> Whoops, I spoke too soon.  This looks like a regression, which needs
> investigation...

Hi Ted,

Sorry, I haven't xfstests code in my hand, but I remember that #255 is used to test hole punching feature.  So I suspect that no extents is the root cause because my patch set of indirect-based hole punching will cause it failed.

Regards,
                                                - Zheng

> 
>                    - Ted
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html