[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130213151455.GB17431@thunk.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:14:55 -0500
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, sandeen@...hat.com,
Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...m.fraunhofer.de>,
gluster-devel@...gnu.org
Subject: Re: regressions due to 64-bit ext4 directory cookies
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 08:31:31AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> They're assuming they can take the high bits of the cookie for their own
> use.
>
> (In more detail: they're spreading a single directory across multiple
> nodes, and encoding a node ID into the cookie they return, so they can
> tell which node the cookie came from when they get it back.)
>
> That works if you assume the cookie is an "offset" bounded above by some
> measure of the directory size, hence unlikely to ever use the high
> bits....
Right, but why wouldn't a nfs export option solave the problem for
gluster?
Basically, it would be nice if we did not have to degrade locally
running userspace applications by globally turning off 64-bit telldir
cookies just because there are some broken cluster file systems and
nfsv3 clients out there. And if we are only turning off 64-bit
cookies for NFS, wouldn't it make sense to make this be a NFS export
option, as opposed to a mount option?
Regards,
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists