[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130213224720.GE5938@thunk.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:47:20 -0500
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: Anand Avati <anand.avati@...il.com>,
Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...m.fraunhofer.de>,
sandeen@...hat.com, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, gluster-devel@...gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] regressions due to 64-bit ext4 directory cookies
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 05:41:41PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > What if we have an ioctl or a process personality flag where a broken
> > application can tell the file system "I'm broken, please give me a
> > degraded telldir/seekdir cookie"? That way we don't penalize programs
> > that are doing the right thing, while providing some accomodation for
> > programs who are abusing the telldir cookie.
>
> Yeah, if there's a simple way to do that, maybe it would be worth it.
Doing this as an ioctl which gets called right after opendir, i.e
(ignoring error checking):
DIR *dir = opendir("/foo/bar/baz");
ioctl(dirfd(dir), EXT4_IOC_DEGRADED_READDIR, 1);
...
should be quite easy. It would be a very ext3/4 specific thing,
though.
It would be more work to get something in as a process personality
flag, mostly due to the politics of assiging a bit out of the
bitfield.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists