[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51237362.201@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:43:14 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
To: <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>
CC: <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<andi@...stfloor.org>, Wuqixuan <wuqixuan@...wei.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] vfs: always protect diretory file->fpos with inode
mutex
On 2013/2/19 20:33, Zheng Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:22:40AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>> There's a long long-standing bug...As long as I don't know when it dates
>> from.
>>
>> I've written and attached a simple program to reproduce this bug, and it can
>> immediately trigger the bug in my box. It uses two threads, one keeps calling
>> read(), and the other calling readdir(), both on the same directory fd.
>
> Hi Zefan,
>
> Out of curiosity, why do you call read(2) on a directory fd? I only
> open(2) a directory in order to execute a flush operation to make sure
> that a file is really created.
>
Because something wrong happened in userspace programs.
After a thread closed a socket, another thread is still reading data from
this socket, but the socket fd has been re-used for opening directory for
readdir()!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists