[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1302220852210.14141@localhost>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:57:47 +0100 (CET)
From: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
cc: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix free clusters calculation in bigalloc
filesystem
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:10:48 -0500
> From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
> Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix free clusters calculation in bigalloc
> filesystem
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 09:01:05AM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> >
> > Moreover when calculating number of root clusters we should be using
> > macro EXT4_NUM_B2C() instead of EXT4_C2B() otherwise the result will
> > usually be off by one.
>
> That should be "instead of EXT4_B2C()", and I don't think this is
> true, since the number of blocks should always be a multiple of the
> cluster ratio. So the use of EXT4_B2C() is a bit of an optimization
> (it avoids an add and mask operation), but it's probably not a
> measurable optimizatoin in practice.
>
> - Ted
Oh right it was EXT4_B2C(), I'll update the description. Even though
it should always be a multiple of cluster ratio it's really bad
precedence for the use of EXT4_B2C() since it is confusing enough
as it is with blocks/clusters.
I'll resend.
-Lukas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists