[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130225183337.GE17503@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 19:33:37 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu, jack@...e.cz,
wenqing.lz@...bao.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ext4: ext4_split_extent shoult take care about
extent zeroout v3
On Mon 25-02-13 20:07:39, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> When ext4_split_extent_at() ends up doing zeroout & conversion to
> initialized instead of split & conversion, ext4_split_extent() gets
> confused and can wrongly mark the extent back as uninitialized resulting in
> end IO code getting confused from large unwritten extents and may result in
> data loss.
>
> The example of problematic behavior is:
> lblk len lblk len
> ext4_split_extent() (ex=[1000,30,uninit], map=[1010,10])
> ext4_split_extent_at() (split [1000,30,uninit] at 1020)
> ext4_ext_insert_extent() -> ENOSPC
> ext4_ext_zeroout()
> -> extent [1000,30] is now initialized
> ext4_split_extent_at() (split [1000,30,init] at 1010,
> MARK_UNINIT1 | MARK_UNINIT2)
> -> extent is split and parts marked as uninitialized
>
> Fix the problem by rechecking extent type after the first
> ext4_split_extent_at() returns. None of split_flags can not be applied to
> initialized extent so this patch also add BUG_ON to prevent similar issues
> in future.
>
> TESTCASE: https://github.com/dmonakhov/xfstests/commit/b8a55eb5ce28c6ff29e620ab090902fcd5833597
>
> Changes since V2: Patch no longer depends on Jan's "disable-uninit-ext-mergring" patch.
Looks good. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
> ---
> fs/ext4/extents.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
> 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> index 372b2cb..3bd3ca5 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -2943,6 +2943,10 @@ static int ext4_split_extent_at(handle_t *handle,
> newblock = split - ee_block + ext4_ext_pblock(ex);
>
> BUG_ON(split < ee_block || split >= (ee_block + ee_len));
> + BUG_ON(!ext4_ext_is_uninitialized(ex) &&
> + split_flag & (EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT |
> + EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNINIT1 |
> + EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNINIT2));
>
> err = ext4_ext_get_access(handle, inode, path + depth);
> if (err)
> @@ -3061,19 +3065,25 @@ static int ext4_split_extent(handle_t *handle,
> if (err)
> goto out;
> }
> -
> + /*
> + * Update path is required because previous ext4_split_extent_at() may
> + * result in split of original leaf or extent zeroout.
> + */
> ext4_ext_drop_refs(path);
> path = ext4_ext_find_extent(inode, map->m_lblk, path);
> if (IS_ERR(path))
> return PTR_ERR(path);
> + depth = ext_depth(inode);
> + ex = path[depth].p_ext;
> + uninitialized = ext4_ext_is_uninitialized(ex);
> + split_flag1 = 0;
>
> if (map->m_lblk >= ee_block) {
> - split_flag1 = split_flag & (EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT |
> - EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2);
> - if (uninitialized)
> + split_flag1 = split_flag & EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2;
> + if (uninitialized) {
> split_flag1 |= EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNINIT1;
> - if (split_flag & EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNINIT2)
> - split_flag1 |= EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNINIT2;
> + split_flag1 |= split_flag & (EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT | EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNINIT2);
> + }
> err = ext4_split_extent_at(handle, inode, path,
> map->m_lblk, split_flag1, flags);
> if (err)
> --
> 1.7.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists