[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130227191115.GA10710@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:11:15 -0500
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
"gnehzuil.liu" <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>,
Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ext4 updates for 3.9
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 02:04:19PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:57:55PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Building now. Can you confirm that nothing on-disk should be awry ?
> > Or will I need a new fsck to detect what happened ?
> >
>
> Well, it's possible that a read from data file which had blocks
> located above 512GB might have gotten bogus information, or a block
> allocated above 512GB might result in a write to the wrong place on
> disk.
>
> So if you are very cautious, running fsck just to make sure things are
> OK is not a bad idea. But it's likely that the directory sanity
> checks would have caught things quickly, or trying run an executable
> would have caused a seg fault quickly enough. If your system crashed
> very quickly during the boot process, you'll probably be OK.
It had been up a few hours before I hit those checks.
fsck never found anything. I do have another disk (XFS formatted) with
a backup from a week ago. I'll run a --dry-run rsync to see if it
picks up any changes that I don't expect.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists