| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5153217B.5070909@sgi.com> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 11:42:35 -0500 From: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@....com> To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> CC: xfs-oss <xfs@....sgi.com>, <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Announce re-factor all current xfstests patches request On 03/27/2013 08:46 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 08:23:07AM -0500, Rich Johnston wrote: >> All xfstest developers, >> >> Thanks again for all your time in submitting and reviewing patches >> for xfstests. The latest patchset posted here: >> >> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-03/msg00467.html >> >> requires all current patches to be re-factored. > > Given that we are now segregating patches into subdirectories, is it > correct in the future tests should be named descriptively, instead of > using 3 digit NNN numbers (which has been a major pain from a central > assignment perspective)? Yes > > If so, is there a suggested naming convention that is being recommended? > > Thanks for getting this change merged in!! > > - Ted > I suggest: 1. They should also be descriptive of the test rather than a number. 2. All lowercase letters separated by _ i.e. something like tests/$FSTYP/break_my_filesystem Thanks --Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists