[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130327205240.GT22182@sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:52:40 -0500
From: Ben Myers <bpm@....com>
To: Zach Brown <zab@...bo.net>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Rich Johnston <rjohnston@....com>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
xfs-oss <xfs@....sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Announce re-factor all current xfstests patches request
Hey,
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:42:17PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 03:05:12PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > What do you think about renaming the existing tests from NNN to
> > NNN-descriptive-name? That way it will be easier for people who are
> > trying to track regressions, since they can easily map from the new
> > more descriptive name to the old test number for comparison purposes
> > (i.e., to see whether a failure is a regression or not, etc.)
>
> It does seem like a good idea to help people map from descriptive names
> to their previous numeric file names.
>
> But do we want to bake it in to the file names forevermore? Would it be
> good enough to start the old tests with something like
>
> _was_test_nr 45
>
> that spits out the old test number in the log?
>
> Just thinking out loud over here.
Maybe a text file containing the mapping would be sufficient. It's not as if
it's going to grow.
-Ben
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists