linux-ext4 - Re: Announce re-factor all current xfstests patches request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130327214804.GA28143@thunk.org>
Date:	Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:48:04 -0400
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:	Rich Johnston <rjohnston@....com>, xfs-oss <xfs@....sgi.com>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Announce re-factor all current xfstests patches request

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 07:54:07AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> 
> Support for named tests have not yet been added. From the check
> script:
> 
> SUPPORTED_TESTS="[0-9][0-9][0-9] [0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]"

Ah, I thought support for named tests was there.  For right now,
though, if we have test ext4/123 and btrfs/123, that's OK and they are
considered separate tests, right?  Or do we still need to keep the
numbers unique for now?

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html