lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130328003547.GX6369@dastard> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:35:47 +1100 From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> Cc: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@....com>, xfs-oss <xfs@....sgi.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Announce re-factor all current xfstests patches request On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 05:48:04PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 07:54:07AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > Support for named tests have not yet been added. From the check > > script: > > > > SUPPORTED_TESTS="[0-9][0-9][0-9] [0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]" > > Ah, I thought support for named tests was there. For right now, > though, if we have test ext4/123 and btrfs/123, that's OK and they are > considered separate tests, right? Or do we still need to keep the > numbers unique for now? Test numbers within a subdir are unique. So yes, ext4/123 and btrfs/123 are recognised as different tests. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@...morbit.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists