[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5159E4AC.7050307@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 14:49:00 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
CC: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Anand Avati <avati@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC V3] ext3: add ioctl to force 32-bit hashes from indexed
dirs
On 4/1/13 2:08 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 01:21:51PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> This would allow a bit more flexibility than just requiring that the
>>> ioctl be issued just after the opendir(), and allow it just after a
>>> call to rewinddir().
>>
>> I guess I do wonder what real-world use that might have, though.
>
> To be honest, I can't think of one. And if the presumption is this is
> just going to be a special case hack, maybe we shouldn't worry about
> the general-use case.
>
> Thinking about this some more, keeping this simple might be better way
> to go. It's not like we really want to be encouraging people to use
> this interface....
>
> What do you think?
Urgh, I guess if we are adding an interface which will live "forever,"
we may as well make it full featured & flexible, as long as the complexity
isn't out of hand, and I don't think it will be in this case. So I'm at
least half inclined to go ahead & allow toggling it on and off under the
right circumstances, even though it goes against what I think is my better
judgement. ;)
-Eric
> - Ted
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists