linux-ext4 - Re: bisected! (WAS Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591!)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874nfps133.fsf@openvz.org>
Date:	Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:01:36 +0400
From:	Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
To:	CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com>
Cc:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
	Steve Best <sbest@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bisected! (WAS Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591!)

On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 00:06:24 -0400 (EDT), CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com> wrote:
> Bisect indicated this is the culprit,
> 
> 0e401101db49959f5783f6ee9e676124b5a183ac
> ext4: fix memory leakage in mext_check_coverage
Strange... 
It changes a bug in move_extent.c (e4defrag functionality)
ASAIU you just previously stopped your bisecting process here. Right?
Is this indeed a first bad commit?
> 
> This following with Dmitry's debug patch applied,
> 
> CAI Qian
> 
> Ý  101.408610¨ ES cache assertation failed for inode: 753 es_cached ex Ý56/5/744
> 81/20¨ != found ex Ý56/5/3396400/0¨ retval 0 flags 5
> Ý  209.858899¨ ES cache assertation failed for inode: 384 es_cached ex Ý57/7/332
> 82/20¨ != found ex Ý57/7/3396400/0¨ retval 0 flags 5
> Ý  209.860656¨ ES cache assertation failed for inode: 384 es_cached ex Ý25/1/332
> 50/20¨ != found ex Ý25/1/0/0¨ retval 0 flags 0
> Ý  209.893587¨ ES cache assertation failed for inode: 384 es_cached ex Ý22/1/332
> 47/20¨ != found ex Ý22/1/34838/1000¨ retval 1 flags 0
> Ý  209.913482¨ ES cache assertation failed for inode: 384 es_cached ex Ý27/1/329
> 40/20¨ != found ex Ý27/1/0/0¨ retval 0 flags 0
> Ý  209.919950¨ ES cache assertation failed for inode: 384 es_cached ex Ý59/5/338
> 48/20¨ != found ex Ý59/5/3396400/0¨ retval 0 flags 5
> Ý  209.931856¨ ES cache assertation failed for inode: 384 es_cached ex Ý7/1/3292
> 0/20¨ != found ex Ý7/1/35879/20¨ retval 1 flags 43
> Ý  209.969282¨ ES cache assertation failed for inode: 384 es_cached ex Ý35/1/361
> 97/20¨ != found ex Ý35/1/36197/1000¨ retval 1 flags 0
> Ý  209.969290¨ ES cache assertation failed for inode: 384 es_cached ex Ý48/1/362
> 10/20¨ != found ex Ý48/1/0/0¨ retval 0 flags 0
> Ý  209.980724¨ ES cache assertation failed for inode: 384 es_cached ex Ý13/4/334
> 89/20¨ != found ex Ý13/4/2161372/0¨ retval 0 flags 5
> Ý  209.980744¨ ES cache assertation failed for inode: 384 es_cached ex Ý61/3/335
> 37/20¨ != found ex Ý61/3/3396400/0¨ retval 0 flags 5
> Ý  209.983848¨ ES cache assertation failed for inode: 384 es_cached ex Ý44/2/335
> 20/20¨ != found ex Ý44/2/36216/20¨ retval 2 flags 43
> Ý  210.020041¨ ES cache assertation failed for inode: 384 es_cached ex Ý61/3/341
> 91/20¨ != found ex Ý61/3/3396400/0¨ retval 0 flags 5
> Ý  210.050100¨ ES cache assertation failed for inode: 384 es_cached ex Ý22/11/34
> 565/20¨ != found ex Ý22/11/3396400/0¨ retval 0 flags 5
> Ý  210.053271¨ ES cache assertation failed for inode: 384 es_cached ex Ý15/1/334
> 90/20¨ != found ex Ý15/1/33579/1000¨ retval 1 flags 1
It does not looks like bigendian issue, actually I cant find any logical
system in the log. The only thing I see is that es_cache is
horribly out of sync with extent_tree. 
Please try this patch: 

View attachment "disable-es_lookup_extent.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (433 bytes)


It just disable es_cache lookup feature should. This should helps to
determine whenever this is a es_cache issue or not.
> Ý  210.053275¨ mpage_da_submit_io failed block=33490 != b_blocknr=33579
> Ý  210.053277¨ ino:384 lbkl:15, b_state=0x00001023, b_size=4096
> Ý  210.053320¨ ------------Ý cut here ¨------------
> Ý  210.053323¨ kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1639!
> Ý  210.053402¨ illegal operation: 0001 Ý#1¨ SMP
> Ý  210.053405¨ Modules linked in: nf_conntrack_netbios_ns nf_conntrack_broadcast
>  ipt_MASQUERADE ip6table_mangle ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ipt
> able_nat nf_nat_ipv4 nf_nat iptable_mangle ipt_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defra
> g_ipv4 xt_conntrack nf_conntrack ebtable_filter ebtables ip6table_filter ip6_tab
> les iptable_filter ip_tables sg qeth_l2 vmur xfs libcrc32c dasd_fba_mod dasd_eck
> d_mod lcs dasd_mod qeth ctcm qdio ccwgroup fsm dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log d
> m_mod
> Ý  210.053434¨ CPU: 0 Not tainted 3.8.0-rc3+ #16
> Ý  210.053436¨ Process fsx (pid: 20565, task: 000000002c358000, ksp: 000000002c0
> 8f480)
> Ý  210.053439¨ Krnl PSW : 0704f00180000000 00000000003033e8 (mpage_da_submit_io
> 0x3d4/0x408)
> Ý  210.053450¨            R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:3 PM:0 EA:
> 3
> Krnl GPRS: 0000000000000015 0000000000000001 0000000000000030 00000000031b4508
> Ý  210.053455¨            00000000003033e4 0000000000000000 0000000000001000 000
> 7ffff00001000
> Ý  210.053457¨            000000002c08fa98 000003d100a8c6c0 000000002c08fb68 000
> 000000000000f
> Ý  210.053460¨            00000000000082d2 000000002204d068 00000000003033e4 000
> 000002c08f970
> Ý  210.053473¨ Krnl Code: 00000000003033d8: c02000215447        larl    %r2,72dc
> 66
>            00000000003033de: c0e50016788f       brasl   %r14,5d24fc
>           #00000000003033e4: a7f40001           brc     15,3033e6
>           >00000000003033e8: a7f40001           brc     15,3033ea
>            00000000003033ec: a7f40001           brc     15,3033ee
>            00000000003033f0: 4120f0e8           la      %r2,232(%r15)
>            00000000003033f4: a7180000           lhi     %r1,0
>            00000000003033f8: 5010f0d8           st      %r1,216(%r15)
> Ý  210.053497¨ Call Trace:
> Ý  210.053498¨ (Ý<00000000003033e4>¨ mpage_da_submit_io+0x3d0/0x408)
> Ý  210.053501¨  Ý<0000000000309a48>¨ mpage_da_map_and_submit+0x150/0x41c
> Ý  210.053505¨  Ý<000000000030a212>¨ write_cache_pages_da+0x4fe/0x530
> Ý  210.053509¨  Ý<000000000030a584>¨ ext4_da_writepages+0x340/0x628
> Ý  210.053512¨  Ý<00000000002024d2>¨ __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x6e/0x7c
> Ý  210.053518¨  Ý<00000000002025fc>¨ filemap_write_and_wait_range+0x54/0x8c
> Ý  210.053521¨  Ý<00000000002fe0f8>¨ ext4_sync_file+0x7c/0x3d8
> Ý  210.053524¨  Ý<000000000023c932>¨ SyS_msync+0x14e/0x1d8
> Ý  210.053528¨  Ý<00000000005de66e>¨ sysc_tracego+0x14/0x1a
> Ý  210.053533¨  Ý<000003fffd0e1240>¨ 0x3fffd0e1240
> Ý  210.053536¨ Last Breaking-Event-Address:
> Ý  210.053537¨  Ý<00000000003033e4>¨ mpage_da_submit_io+0x3d0/0x408
> Ý  210.053540¨
> Ý  210.053542¨ ---Ý end trace f387176e9fcb98d0 ¨---
> Ý  210.053546¨ ------------Ý cut here ¨------------
> Ý  210.053548¨ WARNING: at kernel/exit.c:713
> Ý  210.053550¨ Modules linked in: nf_conntrack_netbios_ns nf_conntrack_broadcast
>  ipt_MASQUERADE ip6table_mangle ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ipt
> able_nat nf_nat_ipv4 nf_nat iptable_mangle ipt_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defra
> g_ipv4 xt_conntrack nf_conntrack ebtable_filter ebtables ip6table_filter ip6_tab
> les iptable_filter ip_tables sg qeth_l2 vmur xfs libcrc32c dasd_fba_mod dasd_eck
> d_mod lcs dasd_mod qeth ctcm qdio ccwgroup fsm dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log d
> m_mod
> Ý  210.053571¨ CPU: 0 Tainted: G      D      3.8.0-rc3+ #16