[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130403123317.GD7741@thunk.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:33:17 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, wenqing.lz@...bao.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ext4: fix cpu_vs_disk conversions
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:58:31PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> All new features are broken on bigendian hosts due to lack of conversion:
> es_cache: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/28/64
> inode's csum and ext_to_ind_migrate are also broken.
>
> Testcase: make C=2 CF="-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
Thanks for this comprehensive patch. I'm currently trying to decide
how much of this I should try to push in before the next 3.9-rcX
window, and how much can wait until the next merge window.
We definitely want to fix the fs corruption bug for big-endian
systems. For the rest, I'm on the fence, since they are less likely
to bite people hard --- metadata checksum is still pretty new and not
fully supported, and the punch hole bug is again also pretty new
functionality.
Also, pushing something to Linus now could potentially disrupt the
patches in the ext4 dev tree for the next merge window. For the zero
extents problem, there's no question what are priorities should be;
user dataloss trumps developer convenience any day. For the rest,
what do you all think? Are they likely to hit people hard enough that
it's worth trying to get this to Linus sooner, as opposed to having
the fixes for the rest of the big endian issues land in 3.10 and
3.9.1?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists