[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130403144244.GC14667@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:42:44 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Shuge <shugelinux@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Kevin <kevin@...winnertech.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: Make snapshotting pages for stable writes a
per-bio operation
On Wed 03-04-13 15:20:19, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 10:01:43AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > A couple of weeks have gone by without further comments about this patch.
> >
> > Are you interested in the minor cleanups and added comments, or is the v2 patch
> > in -next good enough?
> >
> > Apparently Mel Gorman's interested in this patchset too. Mel: Most of stable
> > pages part 2 are already in upstream for 3.9... except this piece. Are you
> > interested in having this piece in 3.9 also? Or is 3.10 good enough for
> > everyone?
> >
>
> My understanding is that it only affects ARM and DEBUG_VM so there is a
> relatively small chance of this generating spurious bug reports. However,
> 3.9 is still far enough away that I see no good reason to delay this patch
> until 3.10 either.
No, actually with direct IO, anything that needs stable pages is going to
blow up quickly because pages attached to bio needn't be from page cache. So
I think it should better make it into 3.9.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists