lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 19:32:29 -0400 From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> To: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@...gle.com> Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org, Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fixup 64-bit divides in linux-3.0 stable backport of upstream fix On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 04:18:15PM -0700, Todd Poynor wrote: > Perhaps the better fix is to revert those additional changes and let > the ext4 folks figure out what to do about the remaining atomic_reads. > > > And care to cc: the ext4 developers/maintainers when sending ext4 > > patches? Can you send me the original patch? I'd like to fix the problem upstream first.... I'm curious why I didn't notice this, since I run tests (and thus build) 32-bit x86 kernels, and Eric Whitney is doing test builds and runs regression tests an ARM Pandaboard. Can you give me details about your compilation environment and how this causing problems for you? Thanks, - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists