linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v3 12/18] Revert "ext4: fix fsx truncate failure"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130418222139.GC19244@quack.suse.cz>
Date:	Fri, 19 Apr 2013 00:21:39 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/18] Revert "ext4: fix fsx truncate failure"

On Tue 09-04-13 11:14:21, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> This reverts commit 189e868fa8fdca702eb9db9d8afc46b5cb9144c9.
> 
> This commit reintroduces the use of ext4_block_truncate_page() in ext4
> truncate operation instead of ext4_discard_partial_page_buffers().
> 
> The statement in the commit description that the truncate operation only
> zero block unaligned portion of the last page is not exactly right,
> since truncate_pagecache_range() also zeroes and invalidate the unaligned
> portion of the page. Then there is no need to zero and unmap it once more
> and ext4_block_truncate_page() was doing the right job, although we
> still need to update the buffer head containing the last block, which is
> exactly what ext4_block_truncate_page() is doing.
> 
> Moreover the problem described in the commit is fixed more properly with
> commit
  Looks good. You can add
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

  I'd just add one nit that you might fix. In case of truncate called from
orphan cleanup code, we don't really call mm to zero the tail of the page.
It shouldn't really matter because the page shouldn't be uptodate but it
might be a trap we eventually fall into so calling truncate_inode_pages()
there might be a reasonable precaution.

								Honza
> 
> 15291164b22a357cb211b618adfef4fa82fc0de3
> 	jbd2: clear BH_Delay & BH_Unwritten in journal_unmap_buffer
> 
> This was tested on ppc64 machine with block size of 1024 bytes without
> any problems.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/inode.c |   11 ++---------
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 5729d21..d58e13c 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -3920,7 +3920,6 @@ void ext4_truncate(struct inode *inode)
>  	unsigned int credits;
>  	handle_t *handle;
>  	struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
> -	loff_t page_len;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * There is a possibility that we're either freeing the inode
> @@ -3964,14 +3963,8 @@ void ext4_truncate(struct inode *inode)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (inode->i_size % PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != 0) {
> -		page_len = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE -
> -			(inode->i_size & (PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1));
> -
> -		if (ext4_discard_partial_page_buffers(handle,
> -				mapping, inode->i_size, page_len, 0))
> -			goto out_stop;
> -	}
> +	if (inode->i_size & (inode->i_sb->s_blocksize - 1))
> +		ext4_block_truncate_page(handle, mapping, inode->i_size);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * We add the inode to the orphan list, so that if this
> -- 
> 1.7.7.6
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html