[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130423150008.046ee9351da4681128db0bf3@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:00:08 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...tmail.fm>,
Alexey Lyahkov <alexey.lyashkov@...il.com>,
Will Huck <will.huckk@...il.com>,
Andrew Perepechko <anserper@...ru>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, mgorman@...e.de
Subject: Re: page eviction from the buddy cache
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 12:57:45 -0700 (PDT) Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
> For now I stand by what I said before (if you find it effective
> in practice - I haven't heard back): at the moment you need to
>
> mark_page_accessed(page); /* to SetPageReferenced */
> lru_add_drain(); /* to SetPageLRU */
> mark_page_accessed(page); /* to SetPageActive */
>
> when such a metadata page is first brought in.
That should fix things for now. Although it might be better to just do
mark_page_accessed(page); /* to SetPageReferenced */
lru_add_drain(); /* to SetPageLRU */
Because a) this was too early to decide that the page is
super-important and b) the second touch of this page should have a
mark_page_accessed() in it already.
I do agree that we should be able to set both PageReferenced and
PageActive on a lru_add_pvecs page and have those hints honoured when
lru_add_pvecs is spilled onto the LRU.
At present the code decides up-front which LRU the lru_add_pvecs page
will eventually be spilled onto. That's a bit strange and I wonder why
we did it that way. Why not just have a single (per-cpu) magazine of
pages which are to go onto the LRUs, and decide *which* LRU that will
be at the last possible moment?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists