lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1367560631.23415.2.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 03 May 2013 08:57:11 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:	linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: imperfect FIEMAP results on btrfs

On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 09:31 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> IOWs, you simply can't assume that a specific test will give you the
> same block layout across filesystems and different filesystem
> configurations. Welcome to the world of "can't assume anything about
> block layout" pain xfstests has been dealing with for years ;)

This is what I also assumed, but wanted to get some feed-back from the
community. Thanks a lot for the answer!

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ