lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1367560631.23415.2.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 08:57:11 +0300 From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com> To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> Cc: linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: imperfect FIEMAP results on btrfs On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 09:31 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > IOWs, you simply can't assume that a specific test will give you the > same block layout across filesystems and different filesystem > configurations. Welcome to the world of "can't assume anything about > block layout" pain xfstests has been dealing with for years ;) This is what I also assumed, but wanted to get some feed-back from the community. Thanks a lot for the answer! -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists