[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130510045544.GQ23072@dastard>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 14:55:44 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc: guaneryu@...il.com, ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
xfs-oss <xfs@....sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: regression test for ext4 resize with
non-extent files
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:05:56PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 5/9/13 10:03 PM, Eryu Guan wrote:
> > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com <mailto:sandeen@...hat.com>> wrote:
> >
>
> ...
>
> > index 53af708..4c3e2f4 100644
> > --- a/tests/ext4/group
> > +++ b/tests/ext4/group
> > @@ -9,3 +9,4 @@
> > 303 aio dangerous ioctl rw stress
> > 304 aio dangerous ioctl rw stress
> > 305 auto
> > +306 dangerous rw resize quick
> >
> >
> > I'm wondering why it's not in auto group :)
>
>
> because I forgot about auto! :)
>
> But it's also somewhat dangerous; it could oops or hang, so perhaps
> auto is not a good idea.
If the bug has already been fixed, then auto rather than dangerous
should be used. If the hang/panic cannot be fixed, or is going to
take some time to be fixed, that's when dangerous should be used.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists