lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 13 May 2013 09:53:27 +0000 (GMT)
From:	EUNBONG SONG <eunb.song@...sung.com>
To:	Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>
Cc:	Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: EXT4 panic at jbd2_journal_put_journal_head() in 3.9+



> Hi all,

> First of all I couldn't reproduce this regression in my sand box.  So
> the following speculation is only my guess.  I suspect that the commit
> (ae4647fb) isn't root cause.  It just uncover a potential bug that has
> been there for a long time.  I look at the code, and found two
> suspicious stuff in jbd2.  The first one is in do_get_write_access().
> In this function we forgot to lock bh state when we check b_jlist ==
> BJ_Shadow.  I generate a patch to fix it, and I really think it is the
> root cause.  Further, in __journal_remove_journal_head() we check
> b_jlist == BJ_None.  But, when this function is called, bh state won't
> be locked sometimes.  So I suspect this is why we hit a BUG in
> jbd2_journal_put_journal_head().  But I don't have a good solution to
> fix this until now because I don't know whether we need to lock bh state
> here, or maybe we should remove this assertation.
>
> So, generally, Tony, Eunbong, could you please try the following patch?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>                                                 - Zheng


Hi, I tested your patch. Unfortunately, the same problem was reproduced.
Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ