lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1368784087-956-6-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>
Date:	Fri, 17 May 2013 10:48:07 +0100
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:	Alexey Lyahkov <alexey.lyashkov@...il.com>,
	Andrew Perepechko <anserper@...ru>,
	Robin Dong <sanbai@...bao.com>
Cc:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...tmail.fm>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
	Linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] mm: Remove lru parameter from __lru_cache_add and lru_cache_add_lru

Similar to __pagevec_lru_add, this patch removes the LRU parameter
from __lru_cache_add and lru_cache_add_lru as the caller does not
control the exact LRU the page gets added to. lru_cache_add_lru gets
renamed to lru_cache_add the name is silly without the lru parameter.
With the parameter removed, it is required that the caller indicate
if they want the page added to the active or inactive list by setting
or clearing PageActive respectively.

[akpm@...ux-foundation.org: Suggested the patch]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
---
 include/linux/swap.h | 11 +++++++----
 mm/rmap.c            |  7 ++++---
 mm/swap.c            | 14 ++++----------
 mm/vmscan.c          |  4 +---
 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
index 1701ce4..85d7437 100644
--- a/include/linux/swap.h
+++ b/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <linux/node.h>
 #include <linux/fs.h>
 #include <linux/atomic.h>
+#include <linux/page-flags.h>
 #include <asm/page.h>
 
 struct notifier_block;
@@ -233,8 +234,8 @@ extern unsigned long nr_free_pagecache_pages(void);
 
 
 /* linux/mm/swap.c */
-extern void __lru_cache_add(struct page *, enum lru_list lru);
-extern void lru_cache_add_lru(struct page *, enum lru_list lru);
+extern void __lru_cache_add(struct page *);
+extern void lru_cache_add(struct page *);
 extern void lru_add_page_tail(struct page *page, struct page *page_tail,
 			 struct lruvec *lruvec, struct list_head *head);
 extern void activate_page(struct page *);
@@ -254,12 +255,14 @@ extern void add_page_to_unevictable_list(struct page *page);
  */
 static inline void lru_cache_add_anon(struct page *page)
 {
-	__lru_cache_add(page, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON);
+	ClearPageActive(page);
+	__lru_cache_add(page);
 }
 
 static inline void lru_cache_add_file(struct page *page)
 {
-	__lru_cache_add(page, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE);
+	ClearPageActive(page);
+	__lru_cache_add(page);
 }
 
 /* linux/mm/vmscan.c */
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index 6280da8..e22ceeb 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -1093,9 +1093,10 @@ void page_add_new_anon_rmap(struct page *page,
 	else
 		__inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_ANON_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGES);
 	__page_set_anon_rmap(page, vma, address, 1);
-	if (!mlocked_vma_newpage(vma, page))
-		lru_cache_add_lru(page, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON);
-	else
+	if (!mlocked_vma_newpage(vma, page)) {
+		SetPageActive(page);
+		lru_cache_add(page);
+	} else
 		add_page_to_unevictable_list(page);
 }
 
diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index 6a9d0c4..ac23602 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -494,15 +494,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mark_page_accessed);
  * pagevec is drained. This gives a chance for the caller of __lru_cache_add()
  * have the page added to the active list using mark_page_accessed().
  */
-void __lru_cache_add(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru)
+void __lru_cache_add(struct page *page)
 {
 	struct pagevec *pvec = &get_cpu_var(lru_add_pvec);
 
-	if (is_active_lru(lru))
-		SetPageActive(page);
-	else
-		ClearPageActive(page);
-
 	page_cache_get(page);
 	if (!pagevec_space(pvec))
 		__pagevec_lru_add(pvec);
@@ -512,11 +507,10 @@ void __lru_cache_add(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__lru_cache_add);
 
 /**
- * lru_cache_add_lru - add a page to a page list
+ * lru_cache_add - add a page to a page list
  * @page: the page to be added to the LRU.
- * @lru: the LRU list to which the page is added.
  */
-void lru_cache_add_lru(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru)
+void lru_cache_add(struct page *page)
 {
 	if (PageActive(page)) {
 		VM_BUG_ON(PageUnevictable(page));
@@ -525,7 +519,7 @@ void lru_cache_add_lru(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru)
 	}
 
 	VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(page));
-	__lru_cache_add(page, lru);
+	__lru_cache_add(page);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index fa6a853..50088ba 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -546,7 +546,6 @@ int remove_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page)
 void putback_lru_page(struct page *page)
 {
 	int lru;
-	int active = !!TestClearPageActive(page);
 	int was_unevictable = PageUnevictable(page);
 
 	VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(page));
@@ -561,8 +560,7 @@ redo:
 		 * unevictable page on [in]active list.
 		 * We know how to handle that.
 		 */
-		lru = active + page_lru_base_type(page);
-		lru_cache_add_lru(page, lru);
+		lru_cache_add(page);
 	} else {
 		/*
 		 * Put unevictable pages directly on zone's unevictable
-- 
1.8.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ