[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130531151454.GB19561@thunk.org>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 11:14:54 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hughd@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 20/20] ext4: Allow punch hole with bigalloc enabled
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 06:37:34PM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> In commits 5f95d21fb6f2aaa52830e5b7fb405f6c71d3ab85 and
> 30bc2ec9598a1b156ad75217f2e7d4560efdeeab we've reworked punch_hole
> implementation and there is noting holding us back from using punch hole
> on file system with bigalloc feature enabled.
>
> This has been tested with fsx and xfstests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
This patch is causing a test failure with bigalloc enabled with the
xfstests shared/298.
Since it's at the end of the invalidate page range tests, I'm going to
drop this patch for now. Could you take a look at this?
Thanks!!
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists