linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] xfstests: fix seek_sanity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 31 May 2013 14:02:38 -0500
From:	Rich Johnston <rjohnston@....com>
To:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
CC:	xfs-oss <xfs@....sgi.com>,
	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: fix seek_sanity_test for fs w/o fallocate

On 05/31/2013 12:15 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 5/31/13 12:24 PM, Zheng Liu wrote:
>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:45:31AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> currently the seek_sanity_test (generic/285) fails on ext3
>>> or ext2 due to fallocate() failures.  Just ignore that test
>>> if the fs doesn't support fallocate.
>>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> I remember that my patch had been applied [1].  But stranger I couldn't
>> find it in xfstests tree.  However, I think that your patch is better.
>>
>> 1. http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-05/msg00534.html
>
> Oh, right, I had forgotten about that.  Rich, any idea?

No other than it was a Friday.  My apologies Zheng.
Zheng as your's should have been committed, what do you want me to do?

--Rich

>
> I don't care which patch goes in....
>
> -Eric
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html