lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 4 Jun 2013 12:09:29 -0400
From:	Theodore Ts'o <>
To:	Jan Kara <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/26] jbd2: Refine waiting for shadow buffers

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:42:37AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Currently when we add a buffer to a transaction, we wait until the
> buffer is removed from BJ_Shadow list (so that we prevent any changes to
> the buffer that is just written to the journal). This can take
> unnecessarily long as a lot happens between the time the buffer is
> submitted to the journal and the time when we remove the buffer from
> BJ_Shadow list (e.g.  we wait for all data buffers in the transaction,
> we issue a cache flush etc.). Also this creates a dependency of
> do_get_write_access() on transaction commit (namely waiting for data IO
> to complete) which we want to avoid when implementing transaction
> reservation.
> So we modify commit code to set new BH_Shadow flag when temporary
> shadowing buffer is created and we clear that flag once IO on that
> buffer is complete. This allows do_get_write_access() to wait only for
> BH_Shadow bit and thus removes the dependency on data IO completion.
> Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <>

Applied, thanks.

						- Ted
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists