| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130607033934.GB7555@thunk.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 23:39:34 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc: David Jeffery <djeffery@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2fsck: detect invalid extents at the end of an
extent-block
Thanks for the review. I took your changes, and added a bit more code
cleanup.
Here's the version I ultimately checked into my tree.
- Ted
commit d3f32c2db8f11c87aa7939d78e7eb4c373f7034f
Author: David Jeffery <djeffery@...hat.com>
Date: Thu Jun 6 20:04:33 2013 -0400
e2fsck: detect invalid extents at the end of an extent-block
e2fsck does not detect extents which are outside their location in the
extent tree. This can result in a bad extent at the end of an extent-block
not being detected.
From a part of a dump_extents output:
1/ 2 37/ 68 143960 - 146679 123826181 2720
2/ 2 1/ 2 143960 - 146679 123785816 - 123788535 2720
2/ 2 2/ 2 146680 - 147583 123788536 - 123789439 904 Uninit <-bad extent
1/ 2 38/ 68 146680 - 149391 123826182 2712
2/ 2 1/ 2 146680 - 147583 18486 - 19389 904
2/ 2 2/ 2 147584 - 149391 123789440 - 123791247 1808
e2fsck does not detect this bad extent which both overlaps another, valid
extent, and is invalid by being beyond the end of the extent above it in
the tree.
This patch modifies e2fsck to detect this invalid extent and remove it.
Signed-off-by: David Jeffery <djeffery@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
diff --git a/e2fsck/pass1.c b/e2fsck/pass1.c
index de00638..af9afe3 100644
--- a/e2fsck/pass1.c
+++ b/e2fsck/pass1.c
@@ -1760,11 +1760,11 @@ void e2fsck_clear_inode(e2fsck_t ctx, ext2_ino_t ino,
static void scan_extent_node(e2fsck_t ctx, struct problem_context *pctx,
struct process_block_struct *pb,
- blk64_t start_block,
+ blk64_t start_block, blk64_t end_block,
ext2_extent_handle_t ehandle)
{
struct ext2fs_extent extent;
- blk64_t blk;
+ blk64_t blk, last_lblk;
e2_blkcnt_t blockcnt;
unsigned int i;
int is_dir, is_leaf;
@@ -1780,6 +1780,7 @@ static void scan_extent_node(e2fsck_t ctx, struct problem_context *pctx,
while (!pctx->errcode && info.num_entries-- > 0) {
is_leaf = extent.e_flags & EXT2_EXTENT_FLAGS_LEAF;
is_dir = LINUX_S_ISDIR(pctx->inode->i_mode);
+ last_lblk = extent.e_lblk + extent.e_len - 1;
problem = 0;
if (extent.e_pblk == 0 ||
@@ -1788,6 +1789,8 @@ static void scan_extent_node(e2fsck_t ctx, struct problem_context *pctx,
problem = PR_1_EXTENT_BAD_START_BLK;
else if (extent.e_lblk < start_block)
problem = PR_1_OUT_OF_ORDER_EXTENTS;
+ else if (end_block && last_lblk > end_block)
+ problem = PR_1_EXTENT_END_OUT_OF_BOUNDS;
else if (is_leaf && extent.e_len == 0)
problem = PR_1_EXTENT_LENGTH_ZERO;
else if (is_leaf &&
@@ -1822,10 +1825,9 @@ report_problem:
}
if (!is_leaf) {
- blk64_t lblk;
+ blk64_t lblk = extent.e_lblk;
blk = extent.e_pblk;
- lblk = extent.e_lblk;
pctx->errcode = ext2fs_extent_get(ehandle,
EXT2_EXTENT_DOWN, &extent);
if (pctx->errcode) {
@@ -1847,7 +1849,8 @@ report_problem:
if (fix_problem(ctx, problem, pctx))
ext2fs_extent_fix_parents(ehandle);
}
- scan_extent_node(ctx, pctx, pb, extent.e_lblk, ehandle);
+ scan_extent_node(ctx, pctx, pb, extent.e_lblk,
+ last_lblk, ehandle);
if (pctx->errcode)
return;
pctx->errcode = ext2fs_extent_get(ehandle,
@@ -1928,10 +1931,10 @@ report_problem:
if (is_dir && extent.e_len > 0)
pb->last_db_block = blockcnt - 1;
pb->previous_block = extent.e_pblk + extent.e_len - 1;
- start_block = pb->last_block = extent.e_lblk + extent.e_len - 1;
+ start_block = pb->last_block = last_lblk;
if (is_leaf && !is_dir &&
!(extent.e_flags & EXT2_EXTENT_FLAGS_UNINIT))
- pb->last_init_lblock = extent.e_lblk + extent.e_len - 1;
+ pb->last_init_lblock = last_lblk;
next:
pctx->errcode = ext2fs_extent_get(ehandle,
EXT2_EXTENT_NEXT_SIB,
@@ -1967,7 +1970,7 @@ static void check_blocks_extents(e2fsck_t ctx, struct problem_context *pctx,
ctx->extent_depth_count[info.max_depth]++;
}
- scan_extent_node(ctx, pctx, pb, 0, ehandle);
+ scan_extent_node(ctx, pctx, pb, 0, 0, ehandle);
if (pctx->errcode &&
fix_problem(ctx, PR_1_EXTENT_ITERATE_FAILURE, pctx)) {
pb->num_blocks = 0;
diff --git a/e2fsck/problem.c b/e2fsck/problem.c
index 05ef626..6d03765 100644
--- a/e2fsck/problem.c
+++ b/e2fsck/problem.c
@@ -954,6 +954,12 @@ static struct e2fsck_problem problem_table[] = {
"Logical start %b does not match logical start %c at next level. "),
PROMPT_FIX, 0 },
+ /* Extent end is out of bounds for the tree */
+ { PR_1_EXTENT_END_OUT_OF_BOUNDS,
+ N_("@i %i, end of extent exceeds allowed value\n\t(logical @b %c, physical @b %b, len %N)\n"),
+ PROMPT_CLEAR, 0 },
+
+
/* Pass 1b errors */
/* Pass 1B: Rescan for duplicate/bad blocks */
diff --git a/e2fsck/problem.h b/e2fsck/problem.h
index aed524d..b578678 100644
--- a/e2fsck/problem.h
+++ b/e2fsck/problem.h
@@ -561,6 +561,7 @@ struct problem_context {
/* Index start doesn't match start of next extent down */
#define PR_1_EXTENT_INDEX_START_INVALID 0x01006D
+#define PR_1_EXTENT_END_OUT_OF_BOUNDS 0x01006E
/*
* Pass 1b errors
*/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists