[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51B8B54D.2040200@sr71.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 10:52:13 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Jan kara <jack@...e.cz>,
gnehzuil.liu@...il.com
Subject: Re: ext4 extent status tree LRU locking
FWIW, I'm also seeing this contention to a much smaller extent on much
more "normal" hardware. I've got a 6-core (as opposed to 80) desktop
machine where I'm doing the same test on a real disk (instead of a
loopback-mounted ramfs file).
I'm seeing _about_ 10% CPU time being used on just spinning on the same
ext4 LRU lock.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists