linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] ext4: optimize extent selection for block removal in case of hole punch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:40:53 -0400
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	ashishsangwan2@...il.com
Cc:	adilger@...ger.ca, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@...sung.com>,
	Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: optimize extent selection for block removal in
 case of hole punch

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:09:17PM +0530, ashishsangwan2@...il.com wrote:
> From: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@...sung.com>
> 
> Both hole punch and truncate use ext4_ext_rm_leaf for removing
> blocks. Currently we choose the last extent as the starting
> point for removing blocks: ex = EXT_LAST_EXTENT(eh);
> This is OK for truncate but for hole punch we can optimize the
> extent selection as the path is already initialized.
> We could use this information to select proper starting extent.
> The code change in this patch will not affect truncate as for
> truncate path[depth].p_ext will always be NULL.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>

Applied, thanks.

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html