lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130623115953.GA16193@thunk.org> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 07:59:53 -0400 From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> To: Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <felipemonteiro.carvalho@...il.com> Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Beginner questions about ext4 On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 06:29:18AM +0000, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: > > I am still very much interesting in knowing this! Are all groups flexible > groups when FLEX_BG feature is activated? > > I found this image for how things relate to one another without flex_bg: > > http://origin-ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S1742287612000357-gr1.jpg > > Does anyone know if there is a simular image with flex_bg??? Historically, before flex_bg, the allocation bitmaps and inode tables for a particular block group had to be located within that block group, per the image that you've referenced above. This had two difficulties. The first is that every 128MB (assuming a 4k blocksize and the default/maximum number of blocks per block group), there would be file system metadata, thus breaking up the maximum contiguous free space available for data blocks. The second is that if e2fsck or resize2fs needed to relocate a metadata block, it reduced the flexibility of where the new location of that metadata block might be. So the flex_bg feature relaxes this constraint. So if we can put the metadata blocks anywhere, where do we put them? That's where s_log_flex_bg_size in the superblock comes in. This is a default policy used by mke2fs and for online resizing where we try to put the allocation bitmaps and inode table blocks at the beginning of a flex group, where flex group N is defined as blocks falling within the range (N * flex_bg_size) through (((N + 1) * flex_bg_size) - 1). Note though that this is not a mandatory layout; there may be times where e2fsck or resize2fs may need to change where these blocks end up living. The other thing which we do with this flex_bg layout is that it influences ext4's inode and block allocation hueristcs. For example, ext4 will try to bias its allocation of directory blocks to try to keep them within the first block group, and it will bias the allocation of data blocks away from the first block group in a flex_bg group. Regards, - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists