| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <51C96BBD.8060701@rs.jp.nec.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 19:06:53 +0900 From: Akira Fujita <a-fujita@...jp.nec.com> To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> CC: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>, ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [BUG] xfstest269 causes deadlock on linux-3.9.0 (ext4) (2013/06/24 20:04), Jan Kara wrote: > On Tue 28-05-13 17:36:09, Akira Fujita wrote: >> Hello, >> >> (2013/05/27 17:33), Jan Kara wrote: >>> On Mon 27-05-13 12:16:01, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: >>>> On Mon, 27 May 2013 10:49:11 +0900, Akira Fujita <a-fujita@...jp.nec.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi Jan, >>>>> >>>>> (2013/05/15 11:57), Akira Fujita wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> (2013/05/15 6:37), Jan Kara wrote: >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon 13-05-13 15:49:24, Akira Fujita wrote: >>>>>>>> I ran into the deaclock with xfs_test 269 on linux-3.9.0. >>>>>>>> It seems happen between jbd2_log_wait_commit, sleep_on_buffer >>>>>>>> and writeback_indoes (Please see ps log below). >>>>>>>> Once it occurs we can't touch FS anymore. >>>>>>>> In my case 300 - 1000 trials to occur. Is this known issue? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The following kernels seems to have same problem: >>>>>>>> - linux-3.5-rc5 >>>>>>>> - linux-3.8.5 >>>>>>>> - linux-3.9-rc7 >>>>>>>> And now I'm trying it on linux-3.10-rc1. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> # ./check generic/269 >>>>>>>> FSTYP -- ext4 >>>>>>>> PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 mcds1 3.9.0 >>>>>>>> MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/sda12 >>>>>>>> MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o acl,user_xattr /dev/sda12 /mnt/mp2 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> # ps -eo pid,tid,class,rtprio,ni,pri,psr,pcpu,stat,wchan:16,comm >>>>>>>> PID TID CLS RTPRIO NI PRI PSR %CPU STAT WCHAN COMMAND >>>>>>>> 1 1 TS - 0 19 0 0.0 Ss poll_schedule_ti init >>>>>>>> 2 2 TS - 0 19 0 0.0 S kthreadd kthreadd >>>>>>>> 3 3 TS - 0 19 0 0.0 S smpboot_thread_f ksoftirqd/0 >>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>> 2391 2391 TS - 0 19 2 0.1 D jbd2_log_wait_co flush-8:0 >>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>> 22647 22647 TS - 0 19 3 0.0 S worker_thread kworker/3:1 >>>>>>>> 22655 22655 TS - 0 19 0 0.0 S hrtimer_nanoslee sleep >>>>>>>> 22657 22657 TS - 0 19 2 0.0 R+ - ps >>>>>>>> 25330 25330 TS - 0 19 0 0.0 S worker_thread kworker/0:0 >>>>>>>> 28963 28963 TS - 0 19 1 0.0 S+ wait loop_xfstests.s >>>>>>>> 28964 28964 TS - 0 19 1 0.0 S+ wait check >>>>>>>> 29180 29180 TS - 0 19 3 0.0 S kjournald2 jbd2/sda11-8 >>>>>>>> 29181 29181 TS - -20 39 3 0.0 S< rescuer_thread ext4-dio-unwrit >>>>>>>> 29199 29199 TS - 0 19 3 0.0 S+ wait 269 >>>>>>>> 29391 29391 TS - 0 19 0 0.6 D sleep_on_buffer jbd2/sda12-8 >>>>>>>> 29392 29392 TS - -20 39 3 0.0 S< rescuer_thread ext4-dio-unwrit >>>>>>>> 29394 29394 TS - 0 19 0 0.0 S wait fsstress >>>>>>>> 29505 29505 TS - 0 19 3 0.0 D writeback_inodes fsstress >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> # df -T /dev/sda11 /dev/sda12 >>>>>>>> Filesystem Type 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on >>>>>>>> /dev/sda11 ext4 9857264 22308 9327564 1% /mnt/mp1 >>>>>>>> /dev/sda12 ext4 499656 499656 0 100% /mnt/mp2 >>>>>>> Thanks for report. No I don't think this problem has been reported >>>>>>> before. Seeing that sda12 is out of space and fsstress hangs in >>>>>>> writeback_inodes(), I suspect we have some deadlock in ENOSPC recovery path >>>>>>> when we want to flush data to disk to reduce delalloc uncertainty. Can you >>>>>>> run 'echo w >/proc/sysrq-trigger' when the deadlock happens and post your >>>>>>> dmesg here? Thanks! >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for reply. >>>>>> I'll take that information when the deadlock happens again. >>>>> >>>>> Finally, I got the following messages on linux-3.9.0. >>>>> Could you take a look? >>>> Is it a real deadlock? >>>> umount wait for flush-8:0 >>>> flush wait for jbd2 >>>> jbd2 wait for bh. >>>> All buffer-heads will be written at sooner or later. >>>> It probably will require significant amount of time, because fs is too >>>> fragmented(that is what this test all about), but it is not a deadlock. >>> Yeah, that is my analysis as well. I was only thinking whether we >>> couldn't forget some buffer locked on some error recovery path (we are >>> getting ENOSPC) but it's not obvious where it would be. Akira-san, could >>> you also send us disassembly of your jbd2_journal_commit_transaction() >>> function so that we can check where exactly offset 0xee0 is in the >>> function? >>> >>> Honza >> >> I attached disasemble code of jbd2_journal_commit_tnrasaction, >> please check it. > Thanks. I've looked into the disassembly now and we are waiting for the > write of commit record to finish. We have submitted the buffer just before > so it can hardly be some issue like forgotten locked buffer. Really > strange. It looks like some problem in block layer, device driver, or HW > itself... I'm thinking how to debug this further - it would be good if we > had blktrace data just before the moment when the hang happens but given > how hard this is to reproduce the traces would be extremly large... > > One idea - can you try whether the problem reproduces with 'nobarrier' > mount option? It could be some problem with flush / fua handling. > OK, I'll try to reproduce this issue with 'nobarrier' (and take blktrace log if I can). Thanks, Akira Fujita -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists