[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130718163301.GB12727@thunk.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:33:01 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: T Makphaibulchoke <tmac@...com>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
tmakph@...il.com, aswin@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ext4: increase mbcache scalability
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:30:24PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 06:55:10PM -0600, T Makphaibulchoke wrote:
> > This patch intends to improve the scalability of an ext4 filesystem by
> > introducing higher degree of parallelism to the usages of its mb_cache and
> > mb_cache_entries.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > fs/ext4/ext4.h | 1 +
> > fs/ext4/super.c | 8 ++
> > fs/ext4/xattr.c | 41 +++++---
> > fs/ext4/xattr.h | 3 +
> > fs/mbcache.c | 432 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > include/linux/mbcache.h | 5 +
> > 6 files changed, 385 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
> >
>
> I see the diff stats, but there was no patch attached to your message.
> Could you please resend the patch to the linux-ext4 list?
Never mind, I see them now. I didn't notice this was a 0/2 message,
and since you are apparently using an old versio of git which doesn't
enable --thread by default (or you have a git config setting which
disables the use of mail threading), I didn't see the patches chained
to the message.
Sorry for being confused,
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists