[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130725001319.GA12994@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 08:13:19 +0800
From: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>
To: jon ernst <jonernst07@...il.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH] vfs: add missing check for __O_TMPFILE in fcntl_init() (Re:
[PATCH] ext4: fix...)
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 09:58:45PM +0000, jon ernst wrote:
> > My purpose is to trigger this bug and fix it. So I manually define this
> > flag for my convenience.
> >
> >> I saw it has
> >> been defined in header file. (fcntl.h) Did I miss anything?
> >
> > I guess that you might 'include <fcntl.h>' header file, right? But the
> > O_TMPFILE is defined in $LINUX/include/uapi/asm-generic/fcntl.h. So
> > maybe compiler couldn't find this header file.
> >
> > Regards,
> > - Zheng
> --
> Got it. Thank you. BTW, the weird thing is I didn't see any
> discussion on ext4 mailing list before Al Viro committed this change.
> The first time I heard about this is someone reporting a bug about it.
> Document about this FLAG might be necessary.
Oh, this flag has been discussed in linux-fsdevel mailing list [1].
Maybe you don't subscribe it.
1. https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/3/181
> Also, about this code:
>
> /* a horrid kludge trying to make sure that this will fail on old kernels */
> #define O_TMPFILE (__O_TMPFILE | O_DIRECTORY)
>
> why not doing something like this:
>
> #ifndef O_TMPFILE
> /* a horrid kludge trying to make sure that this will fail on old kernels */
> #define O_TMPFILE (__O_TMPFILE | O_DIRECTORY)
> #endif
Sorry, I don't take a closer look at that thread. I look at the code,
and it seems that there is no any rule about adding '#ifndef XXX'.
Meanwhile, I notice a comment:
/*
* When introducing new O_* bits, please check its uniqueness in fcntl_init().
*/
But we are missing adding O_TMPFILE flag in fcntl_init(). So I attach a
patch below.
Al, could you please answer this question? Thanks.
Regards,
- Zheng
Subject: [PATCH] vfs: add missing check for __O_TMPFILE in fcntl_init()
From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
As comment in include/uapi/asm-generic/fcntl.h described, when
introducing new O_* bits, we need to check its uniqueness in
fcntl_init(). But __O_TMPFILE bit is missing. So fix it.
Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
---
*This patch is against ext4/dev tree.*
fs/fcntl.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fcntl.c b/fs/fcntl.c
index 6599222..65343c3 100644
--- a/fs/fcntl.c
+++ b/fs/fcntl.c
@@ -730,14 +730,14 @@ static int __init fcntl_init(void)
* Exceptions: O_NONBLOCK is a two bit define on parisc; O_NDELAY
* is defined as O_NONBLOCK on some platforms and not on others.
*/
- BUILD_BUG_ON(19 - 1 /* for O_RDONLY being 0 */ != HWEIGHT32(
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(20 - 1 /* for O_RDONLY being 0 */ != HWEIGHT32(
O_RDONLY | O_WRONLY | O_RDWR |
O_CREAT | O_EXCL | O_NOCTTY |
O_TRUNC | O_APPEND | /* O_NONBLOCK | */
__O_SYNC | O_DSYNC | FASYNC |
O_DIRECT | O_LARGEFILE | O_DIRECTORY |
O_NOFOLLOW | O_NOATIME | O_CLOEXEC |
- __FMODE_EXEC | O_PATH
+ __FMODE_EXEC | O_PATH | __O_TMPFILE
));
fasync_cache = kmem_cache_create("fasync_cache",
--
1.7.9.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists